Taming Inconsistent Management Behaviors

Succession planning identified a director as a potential successor for a vice president role. As a result, human resources arranged for psychological testing with an Industrial Psychologist. The psychologist relayed the results indicating this individual would be equally adept at being either a priest or a military officer without elaborating what this meant in terms of performance. The director thought it quite admirable to have such a range, and took this to mean that he had a wide career scope with many options.

This story captures one of many reasons for inconsistent management behavior. From a tendency perspective, this wide spectrum is extreme and includes opposing behaviors. The range could be quite useful if you are very self-aware, but problematic if you remain oblivious while others observe incongruity in your decision making and working relationship dynamics.

Self-management wise, this range generates a busy internal debate between two opposites. The emotional and mental debate zigzags between:

* Be impulsive or be disciplined?
* Approach this creatively or systematically?
* Be flexible or zero tolerance?
* Be self-serving or go for the greater good?

You will often hear me say that every skill and trait is both an asset and a liability. The power is in knowing when it shifts from the asset zone into the liability zone.

You have a good reason for doing what you do. However it may be inappropriate for the situation or the expectations of your role. Any learned behavior can be unlearned – in other words most tendencies can be tamed.

What you do to tame a tendency is unique to you. What works for someone else may not work for you. Is it worth the time and effort to tame a tendency? Definitely! Giving up the inner debate will save you eons of energy. Plus inspiring employees instead of alienating them is always good for them and for your business.

Share

Comments are closed.